View Petitions

  • Details
  • Signatures
  • Response to Petition
Consideration of a feasibility study into the reinstatement of the former Lynn and Dereham railway

We are petitioning Norfolk County Council for the consideration of a feasibility study into the reinstatement of the former Lynn and Dereham railway, which closed to passengers in 1968. Only a sand freight service remains, which ends at Middleton Towers.

We believe that the economic benefits, encouragement of the use of public transportation, as well as the building of a transport network made to last for decades to come, must be considered.

The railway line was around 26.5 miles in length at its peak and consisted of twelve stations in the following order:

In order Station Year of closure
1 King's Lynn Still active - main passenger line
2 Middleton Towers 1968
3 East Winch 1968
4 Bilney 1866
5 Narborough and Pentney 1968
6 Swaffham 1968
7 Sporle 1850
8 Dunham 1968
9 Fransham 1968
10 Wendling 1968
11 Scarning 1850
12 Dereham

Reopened - heritage railway line

(Mid-Norfolk Railway)

When the railway connection between King's Lynn and Dereham was severed in 1968, it also severed one of the more direct rail connection between King's Lynn and Norwich, via Wymondham. Reinstatement of this line would enable passengers to travel between King's Lynn and Norwich without the need to go via Ely railway station.

In 2019, Campaign For Better Transport published a report which listed the reinstatement of King's Lynn to Dereham passenger services as 'priority 2 -  feasible projects which require further
development or changed circumstances' (such as housing developments).

With significant housing developments planned for Norfolk over the coming decade and beyond, it is our view that Norfolk County Council considers mass transit via rail passenger and freight transport as a priority for connecting settlements with a severed railway connection.

At the moment, the line only goes as far as Middleton Towers, where silica sand is loaded onto freight trains by Sibelco UK Ltd. The former station platform buildings of Middleton Towers are undergoing restoration works by the Middleton Towers Restoration Group.

We believe that reinstatement of the railway can only reach East Winch at this present time. Either new stations would be required throughout the entirety of the route, such as at Swaffham, or have no stations in some of the smaller settlements previously served by the railway.

However, our group fully understands the restrictions of reinstating even parts of the railway line. Limitations, such as roads, developments and nature reserves may limit a new railway to request stops, or no stops at all at certain settlements. It can be considered that the future dualling of the A47 corridor between King's Lynn and Dereham presents an opportunity to incorporate the provision for railway reinstatement in the future and as such, our group believes that Norfolk County Council considers this in its plans for the A47 corridor.

It is crucial, in our view, to focus on planning for the next few decades rather than think solely about 'the now'. Demand for mass transit will only increase and considering a feasibility study into possible reinstatement options would greatly serve the growing interest and desires of Norfolk residents for better rail connections in the county.

Not Specified
Wednesday, 23 October 2024
Tuesday, 22 April 2025
Middleton Towers Restoration Group
This petition currently has 36 signatures in total.
Petition Signatories
36 electronic signatures
 Page 1 of 4, items 1 to 10 of 36.
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
- Data Removed -
This petition has been reviewed and the following response has been offered:

Norfolk County Council is supportive of good rail connections. We work closely with the

rail industry and government to secure improvements to services for the benefit of

residents and businesses of Norfolk. However, the county council does not own or

operate the network. This is the responsibility of Network Rail and private train operating

companies, although government is in the process of nationalisation and bringing the

various responsible bodies under the control of one organisation, Great British Railways.

Therefore, the county council’s role is limited to making the best case for service

improvements and working with various partners to secure commitments from

government to upgrades.

 

Reinstatement of a rail line would be a major infrastructure project likely to be in the

order of hundreds of millions of pounds. To secure investment of that order would

require a comprehensive business case clearly able to demonstrate the benefits of the

project. The project would also need to demonstrate that it had the support from within

the rail industry.

 

A feasibility study – as is being called for in the petition – would be a starting point but in

itself would require the commissioning of consultants and the use of public funds. The

council has only limited funds and would need to direct these towards the highest

priorities with the most likely chances of success.

 

Our recently adopted Norfolk Rail Prospectus does not identify this as a future ambition

for the county, although it did recognise the potential, in the longer term, of the

Wymondham to Dereham connection. We are currently reviewing the King’s Lynn

transport strategy. One of the potential schemes included on the long-list of projects as a

result of comments received in early work is reinstatement of the King’s Lynn to

Dereham line. The long list will be reviewed with the highest priority projects being taken

forward into the draft strategy being developed for the area. This will be the subject of

consultation in the autumn, and the final strategy adopted in early 2026.

 

At this stage, therefore, it is considered premature to commit to a feasibility study. If this

project is included in the final King’s Lynn transport strategy, consideration can be given

to a feasibility study, but this would be dependent on finding funding to enable this to be

put underway.

DateUserDescriptionStatus
 Page 1 of 5, items 1 to 10 of 47.
04/06/2025 12:06(System Event) - Data Removed - Response Published
04/06/2025 11:59(System Event) - Data Removed - Response Published
22/05/2025 13:55(System Event) - Data Removed - Response Awaiting Approval
23/04/2025 03:28(System Event) - Data Removed - Response Pending
23/04/2025 03:28(System Event) - Data Removed - Response Pending
15/02/2025 00:02(System Event) - Data Removed - Petition Active
05/12/2024 23:50(System Event) - Data Removed - Petition Active
21/11/2024 13:12(System Event) - Data Removed - Petition Active
18/11/2024 15:31(System Event) - Data Removed - Petition Active
18/11/2024 10:24(System Event) - Data Removed - Petition Active

Search Petitions